Thursday, 19 September 2013

Mini Ads Get Personal

The weekend’s Integrated Marketing Communication class was almost completely all about how critical it is for marketers to communicate with the single person who is our target audience. To what certain extent can marketing communication be personalised? Actually, it’s not really a new idea that I've never heard of before, but the challenge is how to define the exact individual behind the masses, and how to build engagement with him or her.

The recent Mini billboard has handled this perfectly. It was extremely personalised communication through digital displays showing individually tailored massages to each of the Mini’s drivers. The ad is activated by spotters with iPads, taking photos of Mini’s drivers in their cars, and their image was then shown on the billboard further down the road.


The personal digital message then turns into real interaction like free tanks of petrol, or a lovely breakfast with 2000 other Mini's drivers. It is definintely out of the ordinary to see, instead of a regular old billboard, and a personalised message saying "Early start, Mr. Grey Mini driver? … Need a pick me up? … Fancy a tasty bacon butty? … Mini's buying … See you at the next garage."


Mini's digital billboard performance was only one part of its global marketing campaign “not normal” run by Iris Worldwide. By launching this first brand campaign after almost six years, Mini wanted to celebrate the special relationship the company has with its customers. Using the insight that Mini customers see their car in very unique and creative way, ad agencies then created the campaign that gets Mini drivers to feel like a part of extraordinary “not normal” community.

Whether Mini’s marketers desired to only satisfy their exciting customers, or to grab attention from potential Mini’s buyers with such a fun campaign, they have found a new approach to communicate with Mini’s audience on a totally personal level. I definitely like this “not normal” campaign itself and the way Mini has so successfully used consumers’ insight to delight Mini’s drivers.

Elena Sveshnikova
Current student in the Master of Marketing program at the University of Sydney Business School

Tuesday, 17 September 2013

Interview with Head of Marketing, Google Search at the University of Sydney

A while ago, we imparted some wisdom from when we sat down with Deepak Ramanathan and learned what kind of people Google likes to hire and their approach to marketing. How lucky are we to have opportunities like this? You can get a little taste of the morning with the Q&A video below.


Hongi Luo
Current student in the Master of Marketing program at the University of Sydney Business School

Thursday, 12 September 2013

Marketing for the Good. Watch Greenpeace’s daring protest.

Last week in our Regulatory Environment and Ethics class, a few of our Master of Marketing cohorts spoke about the controversial marketing tactics of PETA, People for Ethical Treatment of Animals. Hotly debated – was PETA’s actions unethical, or just clever advertising?

We’ve touched on this topic before, in class and our on blog when we looked at Queensland RSPCA’s campaign to promote animal rights. When it comes to marketing and communication for NGOs or ecological groups, the way to go about it can be very tricky.


Never shy in the face of injustice, Greenpeace comes along once again to stir up some action. On the 29th August at 6 a.m., 35 activists, some dressed as polar bears, snuck into Shell’s largest Danish refinery, scaling its huge smokestacks and oil tanks to unfurl a rebranded Shell logo.


In 2012, Shell began exploring the Arctic, looking to tap crude. One of the most violate ecosystems, the Arctic is also one of the most difficult to clean up if an accident occurred. Along with breaking many safety and environmental violations, Shell would also be endangering the natural Polar Bear Habitat.

Although Shell’s plans for drilling in the Arctic may not be making breaking international news, organisations like Greenpeace are constantly fighting for the information to be available for all. But has it worked?

While this video has not been produced for a TVC or any specific campaign, it is part of the long running guerilla tactics that Greenpeace have been using to get attention for their agenda. From a content marketing perspective, their footage, while provocative and compelling, perhaps lacks in the “why should I share” department. “Why should I care?” well, for most people who are sharing this video, it is quite possible that ecological issues are already at the forefront of their interests. But what Greenpeace, among many other organisations really needs is content that is applicable, and relatable to people outside of their usual demographic. I’m reminded again of PETA, and their provocative poster.

By employing tactics usually used by the very industries they are trying to fight (e.g. fashion), PETA are able to really strike a chord. I can’t say for certain that they’ve converted many vegans this way, but at least the conversation has become a broader one.

Perhaps Greenpeace should take a leaf out of the books of some of the most shared ads of 2012. I’m sure you’ve all seen “A DRAMATIC SURPRISE ON A QUIET SQUARE”, an entertaining and surprising video, which actually turns out to be an advertisement for a television channel. By finding an interesting and unexpected way to deliver your message, people are more likely to share with their friends.


Although daring has always been in the repertoire of Greenpeace, perhaps to appeal to a larger audience, the words “funny” or “enlightening” or “captivating” should be added? For me, I can definitely think of a few more ways to use those polar bear costumes!

Hongi Luo
Current student in the Master of Marketing program at the University of Sydney Business School

Thursday, 5 September 2013

Ready to vote?



It seems pretty interesting getting through an election race without actually having to be involved as a voter. As we are both are non-Australian, we have an unbiased look at the current election campaigns and how they have shaped our thoughts. To be honest, neither Kevin Rudd nor Tony Abbott seem like very inspiring speakers, yet there are a number of questions in regards to political and economy matters that they are going head to head on. What is the most surprising to us is how far both campaigns have gone with their extremely negative massages. Not only is the content negative, the tone encourages the general public to not only not vote for, but to also fear the opposing party. To the outside observer, the campaigns seem to lose the real value of the candidates and what they stand for.


We discussed an example of this in our Marketing Research for Decision Markers class. Take for example the below advertisements employed by Australian Labor party in their current re-election campaign. This very dispiriting campaign has used what is called the Prospect Theory (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prospect_theory) to encourage people to vote for Labor. But wait, hold on a minute…In these images, no where does it actually say “Vote Labor” as you would expect. This is because according to the Prospect theory, if you are in a ‘winning’ state of mind, or if things are neither good nor bad, you tend to be loss averse and stick with status quo instead of taking the risk of the new guy stuffing things up. However, if you are in a losing frame, or when things are not as good, you are risk seeking, and you would be looking for change – think Obama 2008.

So according to these ads, the prospect theory, and The Labor party, Australians must be in a pretty okay situation. And the clever marketing tactics employed here are working to heighten the feeling of risk in switching governments. Whether this risk is real or not is debateable. But voting, like many other decisions we make, can be influenced by these tactics which tap into the psychology of our decision-making.

Another thing we are noticing is that these campaigns are getting digital. A first in Australian election history, both candidates are heavily utilizing social media to tap into minds of over 12 million Australian Facebook or Twitter users. While Kevin Rudd, like Obama’s previous campaigns, actively exploits Twitter with 1,414,783 Followers, compared with Abbott’s 165,852 Followers, Tony Abbott tends to win Facebook battle with 229,775 “Likes” against his rival with only 114,671 “Likes.” http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/federal-election-2013/social-media Whether social media directly represents real voters’ preferences, it is clearly the most effective tool to engage with voters in real time.

What we can also see is the huge influence of Obama’s campaign on this Australian election race. It started with Kevin Rudd, who recruited a former strategist for Obama. This created a huge public and media backlash – while communicates restrictions for overseas professionals, he is more than happy to nab them for this election campaign. But the problem is as we see it, is that there are some unique skills, assets, and value that cannot be simply copied. We think, probably why Labor doesn’t go further than Twitter.

On the other side, Tony Abbott heavily exploits Obama’s strong roadshow campaigning. We can think of least two main public rallies in which he has been dressed up quite similar to Obama, with skinny suits and white shirts – your stylish political choice. But even more noticeably is how Abbott’s family is involved with his campaign. And it makes for great content. Forgetting policy and politics, it seems the Abbott daughters drum up much excitement and adoration from media and public alike.

In conclusion, we feel we are very lucky for not having to make a tough decision this election day. From a marketers point of view, we’ve been able to sit back, relax, and really take a critical eye to this year’s election campaigning.

 Elena Sveshnikova and Hongi Luo Current students in the Master of Marketing program at the University of Sydney Business School

Thursday, 29 August 2013

Coca-Cola departs from Classic Coke Red to a greener look


I’ve learnt a lot during my studies in the Master of Marketing. Actually, I think that may be an understatement. I walk around now constantly bewildered by my environment, analysing packaging, advertising, reading into the most minute aspects of the world. This is because since undertaking my masters, I have understood that is someone at the end of the chain, making a decision for every minute element of most things.

Along with this, I have gained a lot of respect for the Coca-Cola Company. I’ve written about them before. And despite my status as a ‘lapsed’ customer (I kicked my Diet Coke habit a few years ago), I still pay attention to their products. This is why I am deeply intrigued by their recent new product, Life. Launched into the Argentinian summer, Coca-Cola Life is positioned as a low-cal alternative that is sweetened naturally. Featuring a mix of sugar and stevia, Life has 108 calories and is an offering that sits between Original and Diet offerings. Along with this, the bottle version of Life also boasts the company's award-winning PlantBottle, which is made from petroleum-based materials and up to 30% plant-based materials. Ever the image of a socially responsible global giant, the company hopes to be able to have a 100% plant-based bottle eventually in their line.

Not only is it a risky move, migrating away from the adored and iconic red colour (I recall the New Coke disaster, or when they made their can silver for Christmas), Coke has entered into an uncertain position in the market. Although previously Coke and Pepsi have dipped their toes into the waters of the ‘mid-calorie’ offering, Pepsi currently is swimming with their Pepsi Next offering. Pepsi Next was examined by most of the students of the Master of Marketing in our Evaluate Market Performance class, taught by Geoff Fripp, Industry Specialist Lecturer in Marketing. Although Next, used to be partially sweetened with artificial sweeteners, they have announced that as of June they have changed the formula to only use natural ingredients. This makes the two offerings very, very similar. Perhaps the change of ingredients from Pepsi was in response to Life entering the marketplace.



As with most things, I like to speculate the performance of the new products as they go head to head in the ‘mid-calorie’ market using all the tools I’ve taken away from the course thus far. However, in this instance, I think I might let my thoughts distill a bit longer, unwilling to make the wrong call. I will say however, that I believe this mid-calorie direction is the way carbonated drinks will be headed for the future. I wouldn’t mind my life being a little bit greener!

Would a totally naturally flavoured Coke motivate you to purchase?

Hongi Luo 
Current student in the Master of Marketing program at the University of Sydney Business School

Tuesday, 27 August 2013

Be a part of our Marketing community at Open day on the 31th of August! If not now, when?

Whether you are preparing for the forthcoming Master of Marketing application session, or are scurrying off to find out more about which marketing course you want to apply for, or even if you have already accepted a position – The University of Sydney Open Day on 31th of August 2013 is a definitely must do for this weekend. Even though there is lots of pertinent information you can gain from the University of Sydney website or our social media, take up the chance to really soak up the atmosphere at Open Day.


By attending Open Day and really getting into the University environment you actually can learn much more about what you can expect from the Marketing course. As for me, Open Day was a great chance to get my numerous questions answered by Marketing teachers and current students. For sure, it’s certainly worth your time to casually chat with marketing community members and get their perception on what the Marketing Discipline at The University of Sydney is all about, and how it can benefit you.

I clearly remember the last year Open Day when I made my decision to be a Master of Marketing student. There was a lot of hustle and bustle at the event, with study seekers all eager to fulfill their questions. It may sound too instructive, but it helps to have done some research before the event. From my experience, it really helped me to formulate the exact points I wanted to discuss. Making the decision to go back to study can be a hard one, so Open Day is a great opportunity to understand how to make the transition.

For this year you will meet with Associate Professor Pennie Frow, Program Director of the Master of Marketing program at the University of Sydney Business School and many other representatives from the Marketing Discipline.

You can find us at the PostGraduate Expo. And of course, if you have any questions about Marketing Discipline, or just how we, as students, have found the course, please do not hesitate to ask a question.

Find out more on our marketing website.

Elena Sveshnikova
Current student in the Master of Marketing program at the University of Sydney Business School

Wednesday, 21 August 2013

Belonging to great communities like The University of Sydney, Hilti and Google

For me, one of the great advantages of being a Master of Marketing student at the University of Sydney is the feeling of belonging to a society of truly talented and proactive people. This doesn’t only relate to our tribal affiliations, but also includes additional challenges and projects that our student community takes part in.

An example of this is the 2013 Google Online Marketing Challenge. Six Master of Marketing students: Rita, Yuriko, Yilian, Lillias, Sally and I decided to enter the Google AdWords competition. We were lucky to work with Hilti through this campaign. Many thanks to the team, our faculty supporters and most importantly our marketing partners at Hilti.

I’ve asked our team leader, Sally to explain the key features of this campaign on behalf of our team:

What was your motivation for participating in the Google Online Marketing Challenge 2013?
I’d previously used AdWords as part of marketing campaigns; however I had never actively planned and executed campaigns myself. The choice was based on a desire to learn more about how AdWords works at a granular level, and to experience guiding a client through the process.

What was the most valuable take-away from your AdWords campaign?
Our team was focused on reaching professional Tradesmen in the construction industry. The product we were promoting was a range of high-end cordless drills, the keywords in this category cross into the DIY consumer market; therefore target market messaging was particularly important as we were talking to tradies not DIY consumers.

Analytics help to adjust for QualityScore, which improved our ad position so that’s an important factor and helps to reduce budget not impact.

What was the most difficult part of competition?
Initially, coordinating team member diaries was a challenge, so when face-to-face chats weren’t possible we used group functions in a social networking site to collaborate and the cloud to update our plans and to stay on track.

What was the most exciting moment apart from the results?
Looking at the number of Impressions and CTR was really exciting. We all got a buzz out of watching Google go to work. It was extremely easy to monitor and measure the performance and I found that really exciting and valuable.

Your team included members from different cultures, countries and professional backgrounds, what is your advice to people management?
Recognise that everyone has a different perspective, listen and adjust to ensure you can make the most out of this. It's also important to ensure each person understands what they need to deliver, when and how that contributes to the project.

Getting through this AdWords competition wasn’t only about handling digital stuff, concurrently we picked up a lot about the market Hilti operates on. Nicole and Christina, Hilti marketing managers actively supported and navigated us through such challenge.

I’ve asked Nicole as a Hilti spokesman to answer a few questions regarding Adwords campaign:

What was the company’s motivation to take part in the Google AdWords Competition with Master of Marketing students?
Hilti currently partners with a number of universities on various projects, so we are always open to take part in these types of activities, especially if they relate to our current business objectives. The Google AdWords project is something we were particularly interested in being involved with, as Hilti has had fairly limited exposure to this form of digital marketing in the past. We were eager to see how the students would approach the campaign, and what learnings and recommendations we could take away for our future digital marketing activities.

What are the most interesting or even surprising aspects that you uncovered through that campaign?
While not surprising, the Google AdWords campaign reinforced the importance of creating a unique message and value proposition that was still aligned to our premium brand and personality. In a highly competitive and price sensitive cordless power tool market, the team needed to be creative in coming up with a cut-through message, that would generate the best possible results. Also interesting for us was the much higher percentage of impressions and clicks from tablet users, as opposed to desktop users and even mobile phone users.

Was it useful experience for Hilti in terms of its overall digital marketing strategy?
Definitely. The student team delivered a well prepared and executed campaign, along with recommendations that we can consider as part of our future digital strategy. The focus that was placed on message development, which was adapted accordingly through the duration of the campaign, can be used to inform future campaigns.

In summary it was a good experience that the team has learned a lot from. We’re still waiting to hear the results for this year’s challenge, so fingers crossed!

Elena Sveshnikova
Current student in the Master of Marketing program at the University of Sydney Business School

Tuesday, 13 August 2013

The science behind shopping

Did you know that emotion and value are handled by the same part of the brain? According to research from Duke University, this is the reason why we impulsively buy things that perhaps we don’t really need or want.

As marketers, we know already know some aspects of this. In many of our Master of Marketing classes we talk about the Perceived Value of products. This may or may not match up to the real, functional value of products – but value is in the eye of the beholder. How much value you perceive will affect your happiness, satisfaction and how much you are willing to pay.

Although shopping is definitely a trait passed down from our hunter-gatherer days, researchers are continually trying to understand better the science behind shopping. In an article by the Sydney Morning Herald, the link between emotion and decision-making in shopping explains why we go after those impulse purchases. Using brain-scanning technology, researchers are able to see that while we make both long-term and short-term decisions, impulse purchases are motivated by the temptation to satisfy immediate benefits because our brains put more emphasis on the present than the future.

I know we’ve all probably gone through it. I definitely have. Instead of thinking, “those shoes are too expensive, and I really can’t afford them” my emotional my emotional brain kicks in with “those shoes are BEAUTIFUL and they will go with everything in my wardrobe, and they are worth so much more than the money!” My emotional value for the shoes skyrockets, and impulsively, I buy the shoes.

Shops know about our behaviour, and clever marketers use this information to encourage us to buy and spend more. Here’s one trick shops use from learning about our brain’s behaviour:

Shop Right: did you know that most people walk to the right when they enter a store? This is because the majority of the population is right handed. This means shops use this opportunity to guide customers through a shopping journey where you will see the brighter displays, more expensive shinier items that will pull on your emotional value system.

You can read more on the science behind shopping.

Thanks to Associate Professor Marylouise Caldwell for the blog idea!

Hongi Luo
Current student in the Master of Marketing program at the University of Sydney Business School

Thursday, 8 August 2013

Alexander Wang causes a stir with his free-for-all


In fashion it’s all about exclusivity. So when you get invited to a “One-time-Only” Special event, you line up for five hours in the hot New York humidity, and you go! Especially if it’s held by Alexander Wang.

Last month, the darling of high fashion caused a stir when an undisclosed event turned out to be a free giveaway of hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of clothing. While first hand accounts told of the mayhem that followed, as devotees of fashion were welcomed by a video of Alexander himself explaining “Take as much as you physically can, because there are no shopping bags, no shopping carts” and that everything was free. Screams, catfights, destruction – thank goodness no one was trampled.

However… the saga continues! What was just a cool publicity stunt, maybe clearing out some static inventory, has now been released online for all to see.



Nothing, and I mean NOTHING can be a display of brand loyalty better than this video.

 The designer said in a statement, “I love reaching out directly to our audience; to have a dialog that provokes and at the same time has a sense of wit and irony.” And maybe he’s got the formula to co-creation right? “ This project was viral and street at the same time, which allowed us not only to communicate with our audience through different avenues, but to activate them. I liked the idea of creating a destination that’s unknown, mysterious, and fun, where people can connect.”

Not only has Wang engaged with customers on a personal level – at least those who lived to tell the tale of the free-for-all – he’s also using this opportunity to engage on a different platform with customers around the world, YouTube. Although currently only 40 videos deep, the designer has been making more and more of these candid, odd, weird and funny videos. Although your mums and dads haven’t heard, it’s making a stir with the right crowd.

 In our digital age, it’s easy just to tick the boxes of social media. Facebook, check. Twitter, check. But to engage, REALLY engage with a platform and create content that adds value for your customer is extremely difficult. I know I sound like one of those mad fans in the video, but Alexander, you’ve got my seal of approval.

Hongi Luo 
Current student in the Master of Marketing program at the University of Sydney Business School

Tuesday, 6 August 2013

“Ethical behaviour by corporations is justified only if it leads to greater profits.”

There is one topic I have been procrastinating for a while to write about - whether employing provocative content in marketing communications or campaigns is justified by sales, or is it just not worth it to compromise our legal and moral obligations. I wanted to put off having such a discussion, even when the latest Rolling Stone issue putting Dzhokhar Tsarnaev’s - “Boston bomber” photo on its cover. It got me really mad, but I am still not sure where I stand in this ethical dilemma.


However, identifying and collecting such ethical marketing issues has now become a part of my coursework in our Regulatory Environment and Ethics class, there is no further excuse to postpone the discussion.

Yes, as marketers we are pretty clear that sometimes even backlash created by marketing activities seems much better in comparison with absolute lack of consumers’ interest. So, there is no surprise why in today’s highly connected world such marketing tactics has become even more acceptable. On Twitter for example, as one UK marketing agency reveals, controversial content is a main driver of a successful social media marketing campaign. In a bid to stand out, and thus to capture greater customer attention, many firms are progressively testing how far they can go with controversial or even offensive content.

While for some companies this strategy may bring valuable marketing outcomes, Rolling Stone recent case instead has showed how it also could be pulled in a Boycott Rolling Stone campaign. Once its controversial cover appeared on the Rolling Stone's website, it immediately became a wide spread buzz topic across all social media. Not surprisingly, that nearly all the comments were highly negative. Here is one comment written by a very tolerant respondent: “CONGRATULATIONS, ROLLING STONE. YOU SOLD YOUR SOUL FOR SALES” .

With this Rolling Stone case I am pretty clear where I am. However, according to AdWeek, Boycott Rolling Stone hasn’t affected the magazine’s sales in any way, I would like to argue that even from a marketing perspective not all publicity is a good publicity. Growing sales cannot be a simple justification for being offensive. For me, the main risk of breaking the moral line is not whether an offensive campaign gains or losses in sales, but whether I, as a marketer, act in an ethically reasonable fashion.

It is definitely an endless discussion when it comes to where to draw the line for provocative marketing campaigns. Is this statement: “Ethical behaviour by corporations is justified only if it leads to greater profits” true? Luckily, we get a great chance at gaining a broader view on that through our Regulatory Environment and Ethics class this semester in Master of Marketing program at The University of Sydney Business School.

Elena Sveshnikova
Current student in the Master of Marketing program at the University of Sydney Business School

Thursday, 1 August 2013

Virgin Mobile’s Content Marketing is LOL on Buzzfeed


It’s no secret that the webpage you just stumbled upon, littered with funny cats and embarrassing photos, is a really a sponsored advertisement. If you don’t notice the back slash hidden in the URL (in this case /virginmobilelive) you’ll probably notice that instead of some staff writer, trawling the Internet for pictures of dogs eating birthday cake, it’s the avatar belonging to a leading mobile service provider.

Buzzfeed’s viral success is due to their magic formula of understanding the Internet, and providing the type of content that people will share. Companies like Virgin pay about $100,000 a month in order to obtain a joint venture with the platform and publisher. That's money very cleverly spent, considering Buzzfeed claim they have found the secret to virality. In a recent interview with New York Magazine Jonah Peretti, Founder and CEO, speaks about how they’ve found the “secret formula” to “viral optimisation.” A part of this process is monitoring the performance of posts, promoting ones that do well, and ruthlessly dropping ones that do not perform. That’s why you may have noticed the same few titles and pictures floating around – they get to stay because they attract more people to the site.

Whether or not this formula works, companies are eager to jump on the content bandwagon. Creating new, original content that will gain traction is difficult. It’s an art form. So why not use something that’s already working?

I can’t decide whether Virgin’s collaboration with Buzzfeed is innovative or not. It definitely works though. There is no doubt that people around the world are sharing “11 Things No One Wants To See You Instagram” and “27 Cats That Just Can’t Handle It” but the relationship to how this activity is selling product will be a secret kept by the companies – a difficult ROI to work out. There are other marketing elements however, like making impressions and generating a personality for your brand. Perhaps these intangible elements are even more important in a digital age where people are trying to affirm their own individual identities through the content they consume and share.

Regardless, Buzzfeed’s traffic has doubled within the last 6 months. It doesn’t seem to be going anywhere as a leading platform to communicate with the masses. Perhaps we should take a leaf from Virgin Mobile and embrace collaborative content creation for better, more LOL exposure on the internet.

Hongi Luo 
Current student in the Master of Marketing program at the University of Sydney Business School

Wednesday, 31 July 2013

What if your firm closed its doors on customer service?

What do you usually expect to receive while ordering something online? Hopefully exactly what you ordered, even though there is always a risk of getting something completely different. It could be the wrong colour or the apparel doesn’t fit you well. When such annoying things happen, you hope the company will want to help you resolve your issue.

In our Internal Marketing class, and in a way through our entire last semester at the University of Sydney Business School, I have learned that at the end of any marketing strategy, CRM, big data and many other hidden weapons of the marketing industry, there is a customer. For the firm, to satisfy his or her needs is the objective of their company.

Banana Republic, with its recent online ordering slip-up, seems definitely falling far short of their customer expectation. An American couple were bowled over when they got the parcel from Banana Republic. As Huffington Post reports instead of a tie and pocket square they expected, the package from Banana Republic instead contained sensitive “employee documents: Social Security numbers, tax forms, resignation letters, legal notices, doctors' notes and performance reviews.”


What a shame, but honestly this stuff happens with any firm. The only difference between truly consumer-oriented and others is how the company deals with such situations. You would think from such mature companies like Gap Inc, which Banana Republic is a part of, customers, even those of us who are students of marketing, expect a certain level of customer service.

But what surprised me even more is how much efforts those customers had put in force to reach the attention of Gap’s customer service. They tried to get at the company through regular customer channels, but there were no responses from the firm. The couple only got a serious response when they had employed their social media, communicating their issue through Twitter and Tumblr accounts.

Although a Gap representative finally apologised by saying: “We take the confidentiality of personal information very seriously and we strive to deliver a perfect customer experience, every time… Regrettably, human mistakes happen and this was one of them,” there is still one question for the company: has the company expressed the same apology to its employees whose personal data and information could have been compromised?

I am wondering if Gap has dealt with this situation wisely. This recent Gap case is a vibrant example of how important is to take customer request and complaints seriously and keep your customer service door opened. If Gap has promptly dealt with this particular complaint, we would not be scrutinising them in the media, proving the importance of good customer service for any company.

Elena Sveshnikova
Current student in the Master of Marketing program at the University of Sydney Business School

Tuesday, 30 July 2013

Welcome Semester 2 with open arms!

I cannot believe that for most of our cohort, we are halfway through our Masters of Marketing degree! It’s been such an eventful six months, and I anticipate just as much excitement and learning in the next semester. For the first time, mid-year intake has been available for the Master of Marketing at the University of Sydney Business School. This means some new students will join us this week. I’d like to take the time to welcome everyone who will be a part of our marketing family! And to current students, let’s get right back in to learning together!

Thursday, 25 July 2013

Google’s Deepak Ramanathan tells us what kind of people Google like to hire


I’ve mentioned this on many occasions, but one of the benefits I enjoy the most from being a student at the University of Sydney Business School is all the opportunities for interaction with industry gurus. I can honestly say that most of us a probably pretty ga-ga for Google. So I, along with many other students from the Masters of Marketing and the MBA cohort, jumped at the chance for a Q&A session with the Head of Marketing of Search at Google. Deepak Ramanathan, alumni of University of Sydney Business School, is based in Mountain View, USA, and sat down with us on Saturday 20th July to chat about what it’s like at Google.

The talk was a fantastic back and forth between students and Deepak, gaining great insight not only into Google, but many pearls of wisdom from Deepak’s meritorious career. One major take-away Deepak gave was about how to be a global company. Google, while spanning oceans and continents, is still an international company based primarily in one location. Just like many other companies. Deepak spoke about the importance of first and foremost setting up your company to be global. At Mountain View a range of people from around the world, just like Deepak, work together on the grand strategy of Google. This is not just about fulfilling a diversity requirement. Your company must be set up with different regions, and different thinking in mind in order to gain perspective from all areas.


Deepak gave the example of Google Korea. As a very successful product, Google Search had no doubt that adoption of the new google.co.kr would be high. However, results were not as expected. When Google looked into the matter, it was found that many Koreans thought that the website was still under construction. In comparison with existing websites, such as Naver.com, which had images, weather, links and news, the Google Korea search page seemed ‘incomplete,’ and people thought, “Oh, well I’ll come back and give it a try once it’s finished!” As well as this, it is extremely difficult to type in Korean. This is why users prefer pages with links already there – because it saves them the time and hassle.

Although Google gained great insight into the Korean market, they also learned a lesson on the importance of perspective.


And of course, being Google, we were all eager to hear how to go about getting a job. Although Deepak didn’t walk us through the step-by-step process of sweet-talking our way into the heart of the tech giant, he did explain the three types of people Google likes:
  1. People who get stuff done. People who want to do things fast, experiment, and test. This is often what drives those ‘Google stories’ – the mentality of their worker’s motivation to make change happen.
  2. Be flexible. Expect things to be different, to change. While many of us get caught up on long term plans, Google likes people who don’t plan too far ahead. Especially in an ever-changing industry, you can’t expect all your plans to work out.
  3. Although echoed over and over, one word can’t be beat: Passion. It shows when people have are passionate. And Google is looking for it!
So with this in mind, go forth! Be spontaneous! Have passion! And perhaps Google will spot you a mile away from their newly refurbished Maps app, and hand you a delicious tech job on a silver platter!

Hongi Luo
Current student in the Master of Marketing program at the University of Sydney Business School

Tuesday, 23 July 2013

What’s behind that package you ordered online?

I am constantly telling myself that I need to pay more attention to marketing areas outside of this little screen and keyboard that forms my laptop – and a portal to the world. Recently however, I read on a 2013 Deloitte report that spoke of the changing nature of consumer behaviour. The rapid adoption of portable devices, like smart phones and tablets, has changed not only where we can check our email, but our whole system of behaviour. Deloitte predicts that mobile sales, currently 5.1% of total retail sales, will increase exponentially to reach 17–21% ($628-$752 billion) of total sales by 2016.


So how are companies going to cope with all this fast paced change?

In my research, I came across an article by The Business of Fashion, going backstage at a growing company providing solutions for the fast growing e-commerce industry. Although just ONE aspect in the chain of events involved in online retailing, the article talks about an extremely important element: how do we get our product to our customer?

While many companies have dedicated distribution centers that are already efficient and cost-effective, many start-ups cannot afford this luxury if they are to stay competitive. This is where Quiet Logistics come in. Quiet Logistics, based in Devens, Massachusetts, is unlike any traditional shipping warehouse. Although the 275,000 square-foot facility is packed with approximately 1.5 million units of inventory, the whole place is surprisingly calm and quiet. This is because the whole operation is run predominately by robots. Catering to growing apparel companies like Bonobos and Nasty Gal, the robots diligently fulfill orders with accuracy and efficiency.

The marketing cherry on top of this e-commerce cupcake is the personal touch at the end of the process. You may never know that your package has not come directly from the company you purchased it from. Once the robot fulfills its duties, the package is then passed onto a human to be examined, wrapped – sometimes with a personalized note - with the care likened to a birthday present from your grandma. And this is what makes Quiet Logistics different to other shipping companies.

As we all know, the points of contact with customers are changing, and companies need to take every opportunity to make a good impression. In an age where the retail experience is being challenged, small companies rely on the personal touch Quiet Logistics offers to build and maintain their relationships with their customers.

Although this definitely is not the end of the conversation when it comes to the growing e-commerce industry, it’s an interesting aspect think about and understand. As marketers, mapping journeys, like the one of your product, from website to doorstep, can provide opportunities for innovation and moments for you to make another connection with your customer.

You can read more about Quiet Logistics.

Hongi Luo
Current student in the Master of Marketing program at the University of Sydney Business School

Thursday, 18 July 2013

Animal rights – marketing to just get a reaction?

“There’s no such thing as bad publicity.” Although this age old saying can be disputed, and it’s validity questioned from situation to situation, when it comes to the protection of animals, perhaps this quote rings true.


Last week the Queensland RSPCA launched a repositioning campaign with the help of creative agency, Engine Group. ‘WE are all creatures great & small’ aims to create empathy in people toward animals by sharing some of the elements and aspects that make humans and animals to closely interconnected. With a little help from the photo-retouching department, the similarities between humans and animals are not only written, but also shown.

Does it work?

Some of the pictures are definitely a bit eerie, dipping into the uncanny valley with a pussycat looking pensive with human-like eyes reminding us that 90% of a cat’s DNA sequence is identical or ours. Perhaps this discomfort is what makes the campaign successful.

The toolbox of marketing for non-profit organisations with ecological agendas is a small one. Often you can reach for the cutesy ‘please pity us’ approach, using small children, puppy dogs, and sad drought laden landscapes. Or in contrast to that, you can use the ‘shame and guilt’ approach, creating pressure by pointing the finger at potential supporters. This second approach is more aggressive. It’s saying, ‘it’s your fault these chickens are caged’ ‘it’s your fault our oceans are filled with plastic,’ and it brings blame, but also defence.

In our Contemporary Consumer Insight class last semester at the University of Sydney Business School, I looked into how non-profits conducted marketing in ways that were effective or ineffective. The more aggressive approach often uses real facts and data to appeal to a sense of reason within people. However, overwhelmingly the insight learned is that people are defensive and respond negatively. It is because they do not want to be blamed and automatically try and stand up for our actions. The prime example is the argument of vegetarianism and meat consumption. Although there are many facts out there that accuse meat-eaters of ruining the planet, it is just as easy to turn around and say, “eating meat is natural and I can do what I like!”

Often ecological agendas come from a passionate place. This is why it is so easy for marketing activity to fall into an accusatory tune. By knowing that this is ineffective, marketers can look at other strategies to communicate.

The campaign by Queensland RSPCA reaches a place in between cute and creepy. It aims not to guilt us into caring, but rather reminding us to be more aware. And whether or not this campaign has actually invoked empathy in people, it’s definitely been successful in grabbing attention. We feed our sense of curiosity to the weird and bizarre by sharing and talking with others, as I have done here. In the case of animal rights, “There’s no such thing as bad publicity,” and the RSPCA have done a great job in getting people’s attention.

Hongi Luo
Current student in the Master of Marketing program at the University of Sydney Business School

Tuesday, 16 July 2013

Why we become a brand liker on Facebook?

I have just become a Red Bull Facebook fan. Honestly I don’t know what compelled me to sign up. Yes, I do like all extreme sport images they post. But being a Master of Marketing student, I query about if there is something more than simply being a Facebook fan of particular brand, or whether or not it actually affects my purchasing habits of Red Bull?

Why do consumers sign up for brand pages in social networks? This question has become the focal interest in many marketers when trying to calculate ROI and find out the real value in brand social media subscribers. And do we, as marketers, actually understand what the reason why people ‘like’ particular brand on Facebook?

New research “The Value of a Facebook Fan 2013” conducted by Syncapse shows that 78 per cent of brand Facebook fans are already existing product or services customers. As a rule, it is primarily for restaurants, large retailers, FMCG-sector. However, there are exceptions - brands whose products are desired by many, but not available to everyone. For example, subscribers of BMW are only 36% of its clients.

 
The study focused on the Facebook communities of top the 20 brands in key consumer categories and involved over 2,080 people through evaluating some key factors like spending, loyalty, willingness to recommend, acquisition cost, and brand empathy.

Syncapse found that 49 per cent have become brand fans because they truly like the specific brand and thus use Facebook to support beloved brand. Other 31 per cent consider brand Facebook page as place where they can share their personal good experiences.

While real brand fans and supporters dominate Facebook pages, there is still 42 per cent those who primarily subscribe to brand pages “to get a coupon or discount.” Research shows that in some cases showed in popular retail brands like Zara, H&M and Wal-Mart – people have become brand Facebook likers while hunting for valued benefits such as coupons and discounts rather than aiming to support the brand.

Going through the research paper, I found myself between those 41 per cent who simply want to be updated with the brand news, and those 35 per cent willing “to participate in contests”. In this case, the question is whether or not my particular “like” could bring any value to Red Bull.

Seriously, it has become pretty obvious from the research that with the goal to multiply our social media efforts and investments, we as marketers need to clearly understand and tap into the motivation of our brand fans. Instead of wasting our marketing budget on fan-hunters looking for a bargain, we should further build the emotional ties and relationships with the 49 per cent of loyal brand likers.

Elena Sveshnikova
Current student in the Master of Marketing program at the University of Sydney Business School

Thursday, 11 July 2013

Dear Google, From Melbourne.

Moving to a new country can be extremely daunting. In fact, travelling any where outside of your locality can be a major pain, and major brain drain. Once the sparkle and wander of your new surroundings wear off, and the overwhelming sense of confusion and exhaustion sets in, we all have that moment – “where am I?”


When I moved to Sydney to attend the Master of Marketing, at the University of Sydney, I arrived bright eyed and enthusiastic. Granted, I was terrified of public transport for the first few days, and I think I must have worn a hole in my sneakers from walking everywhere. I eventually warmed up to confidently catching buses, trains and ferries, fearlessly making transfers and crossing the entire city of Sydney. And without a doubt, I owe my public transport skills to my iPhone, Google Maps, and that little blue GPS dot.

Let’s not get into Apple Maps. That’s a whole other conversation.

In July of 2012 Google added live public transport directions to Sydney on Maps. This wasn’t just the location of bus stops, train stations or major public transport hubs – this was an app that could plan your journey from beginning to end, transfers and street crossings included. When embarking on a new bus journey for the first time, you could follow your little blue GPS dot, counting down the stops before yours, and confidently press the “BUS STOP” button without fear you are miles from your intended destination.

I know this all sounds very trivial. But I am an advocate for public transport, especially for travellers in a new city. Not only is it convenient and cheap, it gives a sense that the city is welcoming you in, letting you feel right at home, and allowing you to know which train station to get off at. And I think that’s good marketing.

After being sheltered in my public transport bubble in Sydney, Google shocked me back down to earth when I recently visited Melbourne for the weekend. “Public Transport coverage may not be available in this area.” Why not?! Apparently this topic is greatly debated over on the Internet. There are forums, petitions, websites, articles that all call for the collaboration of Public Transport Victoria to work with Google Maps to provide journey planning for Melbourne. For a city with one of the world’s largest rail systems, and the biggest tram system in the English-speaking world, a consumer demand is definitely not being met. In comparison, it seems embarrassing that Perth, Adelaide and Canberra have long had their Google Maps working with public transport.

I’m not sure to whom I am complaining to, but from a marketing perspective, when there is an overwhelming demand, such as this, from your customer – you deliver! The benefits are endless. As a tourist destination, as an ecologically minded city, and while you’ve already got all these trains, buses and trams laying around anyway – Google and PTV, you need to sort it out!

Hongi Luo
Current student in the Master of Marketing program at the University of Sydney Business School

Tuesday, 9 July 2013

Australia at Cannes Lions


Australian Ads have had the most successful campaign in the history of the Cannes Lion.

The 60th Cannes Lions International Festival of Creativity has become a proud part of Australian advertising history. Never before has Australian creative talent fully dominated the list of Cannes Lions winners. In my opinion, the Cannes festival is highly conservative – a kind of bourgeois event where you, as an advertiser, needs to prove your creativity, rather than being simply recognised for your talent. With this in mind, just it is impressive to see the performance of by Melbourne’s McCann for their advertisement for Metro Trains entitled "Dumb Ways to Die". As well as reaching viral status, the cute and slightly morbid cartoon scored five Grand Prix: film, PR, direct, radio and integrated.

It was a truly massive event in Cannes this year, more than 12,000 advertisers with about 35,000 ad works out lion hunting. A numbers of creative icons held inspiring speeches guiding the audience on the future of advertising. Speakers such as Apple ad-man Lee Clown, Chuck Porter - whose provocative anti-tobacco “Truth” campaign is already cutting down the number of school smokers, fashion guru Vivienne Westwood, and many others talked about two popular trends that’s going to modify the advertising world.

The first aspect is the real social impact that ads create. It doesn’t matter whether you serve not-for-profit campaigns or are creating commercial advertisements; it is time to take greater social responsibility behind you commercials. Nearly all the cases and communications at Cannes gave the impression of this idea. From public campaigns like Metro Trains’ to Coca-Cola’s “Small World Machine,” the trend of taking social responsibility when marketing a message is growing.


Technology is the other buzz topic at Cannes. This can’t be communicated better than Lee Clown, the “Think Different” creator, when he stressed:

“When the camera was invented, artists didn't just throw away their brushes and start taking pictures. It was technology for many years before artists discovered what they could do with it. I think the artist still hasn't discovered the possibilities in new media and the Internet and how you use this technology to beautifully and intelligently express brands. Technologists have had the lead for a while, but the artist will take over.”

From the 60th Cannes Lions, one simple idea can be the most valuable take-away. The capacity of technology, utilised by creative minds may be the way forward to finally support our daily life and brand experiences.

You can see a list of all winners and nominates on the Cannes Lions website.

Elena Sveshnikova
Current student in the Master of Marketing program at the University of Sydney Business School

Tuesday, 2 July 2013

Is social media really a worthy marketing tool?

No one would deny that social media is the major marketing buzzword nowadays. And it’s definitely going to generate buzz for a while. Nearly all companies are already on the way to become even more digital and “social”. It seems so exciting we can achieve cost effective direct collaboration and communication with a customer that was never achievable before.

But the question is whether social media, like many other innovations before it, is good or evil. While we are getting more social with our marketing, the risks involved with reputation management should not be underestimated. Only one online post by a dissatisfied customer or unhappy employee may profoundly affect a brand or company’s reputation. One can recall McDonald’s ‘social’ failure when an online campaign was hijacked by consumer’s complaints, along with many other examples of social media disasters.

Recent research from The Chartered Institute of Marketing discloses that only 44% of conducted firms not only identify the possible reputational issues but also have already applied guidelines and polices to regulate their presence in social space. 60% of those surveyed companies introduced such policies only in 2011-2012.

http://theraconteur.co.uk/risk-and-reputation-preparing-for-reality/#sthash.1H4B2Vsm.dpuf

As marketers we all want to generate attention for our brands. And social media brings enormous opportunities for this. Every single post may be a great channel for storytelling and engaging with customers. But we also need to keep in mind the risks related to social media. You can never really estimate what trends will catch on, how people will react, or predict the success of social media endeavors. It is all about how you estimate the risks you take.

Elena Sveshnikova
Current student in the Master of Marketing program at the University of Sydney Business School

Thursday, 27 June 2013

Interbrand, VERY IMPORTANT PEOPLE, and Us!

A few weeks ago Interbrand held their annual Brands Under the Spotlight event at the Griffin Theatre Company, focusing on the very important people who connect you to your brand: employees. The half-day event featured a series of presentations and panel discussions with speakers from Bain & Company, 8 Hotels, Realestate.com.au, RedBalloon, Telstra and Interbrand. A few of our Master of Marketing Students were lucky enough to be in the audience for such an inspiring and insightful morning. Here is Michel Caux and Sumi Yoshioka.

Although we are not employees of the Business School, speakers that morning made me realise that we, as students, are very important people, to the brand of the University of Sydney. So, as a way to better communicate and understand our brand, I wanted to introduce some of our finest brand ambassadors!

Michel Caux
With a background in Engineering and Economics, Michel has been working in B2B and B2C Marketing for more than ten years. Working in big multinationals have gave him the opportunity to choose an area within Marketing where he feels most passionate about: Health Care.

Why did you choose Marketing?
To be part of the Master of Marketing program is a great opportunity to formally validate work experience, expand knowledge and to be up to date in marketing trends, which will open new doors to career development.

What is one thing that stuck with you from the Interbrand event?
Very interesting Event. The utilisation of Telstra’s NPS has been fantastic, taking advocacy to the next level, making their employees real brand ambassadors, empowering with customer service capabilities. What stuck with me is that the marketing responsibility not only lies with the Marketing department, but all the different functions within a company. It sounds obvious, but it is an every day battle. Other departments of the firm also need to understand that success for the company is also their responsibility. We all have a direct impact on the processes that adds value to the customer. The consumer / end user has multiple touch points with different functional areas of the firm, and all of them have a direct impact on the Brand Equity. Again, it sounds obvious, but is very easy for them to forget.

Sumi Yoshioka
Sumi is originally from Tokyo, Japan. She has a background in PR of a luxury automotive company in Tokyo and architect agency in Sydney. Previous to the Master of Marketing at the University of Sydney, Sumi studied communication & media in Tokyo and California.

Why did you choose Marketing?
When I was working at Audi Japan, I developed strong interests in the influence and potential of brand marketing. In addition to my experience in public relations, I thought studying marketing will be essential for me to pursue my career in brand management.

What are you getting most out of the program?
The ability to study and communicate with my talented classmates from various industries and cultural backgrounds.

What is one thing that stuck with you from the Interbrand event?
I found there were many topics related to our Internal Marketing classes. Richard Hatherall, from Bain Company, really stuck with me. He started with his personal experience at two airplanes with humour, which I thought he successfully grabbed the audience's initial attention. He then spoke about the importance of the net promoter score with real life examples.

Hongi Luo
Current student in the Master of Marketing program at the University of Sydney Business School

Tuesday, 25 June 2013

Six Questions: James Watson

Last month the University of Sydney’s Business School held Branding You, a showcase reception at the new Business School CBD Campus. We were lucky to get the chance to hear about personal branding from an esteemed panel, including a graduate of the marketing discipline here at the business school, James Watson.

James, one of our first class Honours graduates in Marketing, has had a meritorious career with Procter and Gamble in Australia and Singapore, Reckitt Benckiser in Australia, the UK and USA and PZ Cussons in Australia. James spoke about many different aspects of branding and shared with us his own experiences in building his personal brand. One of the most important aspect James spoke about was staying on message and consistent. Although it’s a given when it comes to thinking about brands, often we forget to be very honest with ourselves, and that’s when our personal brand strays off message – we do something out of character, take a job we don’t really want, or forget our goals and what we are trying to achieve.

On the topic of consistency, we’ve remained consistent, and asked James our Six Questions.

1. What is your favourite thing that you do in a regular day as a marketer?
Regular? Define regular? I chose marketing as a career path, because no one day is the same as another and the opportunities are endless. That said, just like bringing up kids, you have a responsibility to feed, nurture, protect and develop brands in your custody or they won't grow and survive. Seeing the hard work, energy and passion you put into doing this manifest itself in great business results is my favourite thing.

2. Describe your job in 5 words or less:
No right or wrong answers.

3. What keeps you motivated?
Having a very clear focus on where I and my family want to go, what we want to achieve, by when we would like to achieve it, understanding what it will take to get us there and then actually taking ownership for doing something about making it all happen.

Family matters. Learning inspires. Collaboration creates outcomes. Results are rewarding. Experience is priceless.

4. Where do you think you'll be in 10 years?
I don't think, I know as a family, we will be back in Australia for our kids' secondary school education. We have a long-term horizon as a family with some critical milestones outlined. There is and naturally needs to be some flexibility around what happens or what we choose to do based on emerging opportunities in between these milestones, but at least we know what we are shooting for and have a road map for where we are going.

5. If you were an animal, what animal would you be?
A Tiger. Largest of the 4 big cats and known in the childhood book about Pooh Bear for having lots of 'bounce'. They are a species that adapts to their location. Skills like this are critical to successfully managing and influencing stakeholders in the business world. They have excellent sight and hearing. Awareness plays an important role in your success as a marketer. They are most active early in the morning and in the evenings. I am an early riser and known for getting a second wind in the evenings. Tigers are also strong swimmers. I am a passionate and competitive Masters swimmer. Tigers are found in a variety of habitats. If you want to succeed in fast moving consumer goods marketing, you need to be willing to work across a variety of brands and move internationally. They do like their solitude. As a strategist and innovator, I value my thinking time. Tigers aren't afraid of more formidable predators. Some of the most rewarding career experiences for me have come from working on smaller and non market leader brands within a business and taking on the big guys. Finally, Tigers are strategic about how they hunt. I know from experience that if you plan to succeed, you increase the likelihood you will.

6. What is the one book you would recommend everyone to read?
I'd prefer author and genre... Iain M. Banks. Iain sadly passed away over the June long weekend. He wrote Space Opera and is famous for his books about 'The Culture'. Think differently and look for inspiration in places others don't necessarily think to look.

Hongi Luo
Current student in the Master of Marketing program at the University of Sydney Business School

Thursday, 20 June 2013

3-Bee Printing: Clever Advertising



3-D Printing. Who hasn’t heard of 3-D Printing? I can tell the hot-topic is on the minds of the creative team at Dewar’s Whiskey, and they’ve very cleverly jumped into the bandwagon with their campaign for the new Dewar's Highlander Honey.

The very cinematic clip depicts “The sweetness of honey. The bite of 80,000 bees.” The ‘trailer’ is for a documentary on the process of how the bees build real sculptures out of natural honeycomb. Part nature, partly encouraged by designers, you can say this is co-creation taken to another level!


This ongoing project shows how brands can still stay fresh and relevant, even if they are for something as old and classic as whiskey. Started in 1846, the Scottish whiskey is now manufactured by the Bacardi Company. A fine balance of classic nostalgia - the traditional shape of the bottle, the quaint design of the label – mixed with contemporary applications – associations with movie stars, embracing technology trends – has seen brands such as Dewar’s stand the test of time.

Even if you’re not a Whiskey drinker, it’s a nice way to spend a couple of minutes.

Hongi Luo
Current student in the Master of Marketing program at the University of Sydney Business School

Tuesday, 18 June 2013

Mid-year Intake closing soon!

For the first time, the Master of Marketing programme is taking applications for the second semester. Whether it’s a career change, or taking the decision to broaden your skill-set, now’s the time to apply!


I can confidently say that for myself, as well as my fellow Masters of Marketing students that semester one has been intense, but fulfilling. We’ve tried to share some of the things we have encountered during our time, but the experience and learning is definitely one that is cannot be shrunk down to paragraphs and sentences. The below video captures some of the aspects of our degree while showcasing some of our current students.


If you have any questions about enrolment, or just how we, as students, have found the course, please do not hesitate to ask a question in the comments.

Hongi Luo
Current student in the Master of Marketing program at the University of Sydney Business School

Thursday, 13 June 2013

Can Sushi change customer behaviour?


I came across this interesting article about a Sushi Restaurant in New York City, bucking the American tradition of tipping.

Brought to attention by food critic, Ryan Sutton, Sushi Yasuda has implemented a “Gratuities not accepted” rule. In Ryan’s blog post, he goes into detail behind the owner’s decision to cut out tipping. The main reason, as explained on the restaurant’s receipt, is that service staff are fully compensated for their services with a living wage – so why the need to tip?


I feel this also addresses a very important internal communication issue. Whether the owner knows it or not, buy implementing this rule, his staff – from kitchen hands, to waiters, to chefs – are united under the same wage system. I know this sounds a bit stale, but think about it: when you go to a restaurant in America, you tip your waiter. But the experience is not solely reliant on their hard work. By treating all Sushi Yasuda’s staff as equal employees, entitled to a living wage, it unites them to do a better job TOGETHER.

With the minimum wage is still laughable in America; a few places are starting to implement the same strategy. Providing a living wage for your employees mean they are happier, work better and work smarter. What is difficult about America is that it is not only about changing the economics of the system, but to eliminate or alter the whole social custom.

So, although on paper it all sounds good, especially for the employees, but can sushi change customer behaviour?

Hongi Luo
Current student in the Master of Marketing program at the University of Sydney Business School